Tuesday, August 4, 2015

TWO SPEAKINGS, TWO COVENANTS, TWO BOOKS

“God, who at various times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, has in these last days spoken to us by His Son…” (Heb. 1:1-2). God has spoken, revealed Himself to mankind, on two distinct occasions, the context not implying two singular speakings but rather two time periods of speaking with distinct methodologies and purposes. “In these last days” since the coming of Christ (implied) -- the writer of Hebrews has now stepped past the cross into the end times, the church age – God has spoken again, and this time He has “spoken to us.” Today, “us” is still “us”.  The writer views history, as it relates to divine revelation, as two time periods, “in time past” and “in these last days.”
The Old Testament is God’s self-disclosure; it is God telling man about Himself: The main character is God, the setting is God’s covenant with His chosen people and the speaker is God.  It is the revelation of God revealed through man, history and Israel – who He is, His attitudes, attributes, likes, dislikes, what He tolerates, His powers, what He does and how He responds to the human condition – within the legal parameters of the covenant He makes with Israel.  The Old Testament reveals to mankind God’s character and nature, His desire for relationship and holiness, and His judgment against sin, within the context of His covenant people, Israel, and His Law.
The New Testament is God speaking forth the revelation of His Son.  The prophets spoke as mere mouthpieces, but when the Son spoke it was God Himself speaking, and in a sense it is God being revealed By His Son in and through the Son’s life, the Son’s message, the Son’s redemptive work and the Son’s  return to establish His (i.e., God’s) eternal Kingdom. The New Testament reveals to mankind God’s redemptive plan established before the foundations of the world with the foreordained sacrifice of the Son of His love, that we, the “us” of Hebrews 1:2, might be partakers of salvation and know eternal fellowship with God through His covenant of Grace – His indescribable grace.
It is therefore contextually correct to interpret Hebrews 1:1 and 2 as directly referencing the Old Testament and New Testament respectively. The foundation of each covenant is a book, and in each book it is God speaking. The primary reason there are two books is to define these two uniquely different covenants, which are people and time specific. Embedded in the Old Testament historical narratives is a wealth of rich insight into the character and nature of God, providing valuable principles and lessons for living the Christ-life. The Law teaches us about the character of the Lawgiver. The wisdom of Proverbs provides practical moral and spiritual guidance, God’s ageless wisdom to live by, and the Worship Books provide revelation of a relational God, inspiring models of how to communicate with and worship God. This is not the substance of doctrine but rather tools, crib notes, for being a delight to our loving Father. The “new and better covenant” has new and better commandments to regulate the Christian life on the road to eternity with God. All New Testament doctrine must be based on New Testament writings – one wouldn’t use a California Roadmap to travel Missouri – new wineskins require new wine. Any theological precepts or principles drawn from the Old Testament must be filtered through the cross, the new covenant teachings, which will either accept them, modify them, or reject them.   

“FOR YOU ARE NOT UNDER LAW BUT UNDER GRACE”

No comments: